This is the second post in a series of three on the state of the postmodern family. We are examining the changes from 50 years ago to today of men, women, and kids within the family unit. The data was based from a Family Ministry class taught by Dr. Chap Clark at Fuller Theological Seminary. In The State of the Postmodern Family (Part 1), I discussed the “roles/expectations” of men, women, and kids within today’s family. This post will explore the “values” of the family 50 years ago versus today. My final post in the series will be a discussion on their “lifestyles”.

VALUES

For Women:

  • In the 1950’s, women valued “relationships”. The values they possessed was based on the role they played within the family. The order of the relationships they valued were as follows: 1) Children; 2) Friends; 3) Husband
  • Today, women want to be taken seriously. They want to be valued for value’s sake…women generally want to be valued, and to have a relationship that is meaningful. They desire connection. This may sound similar to 50 years ago, but the difference is in the means. Being valued is the route to relational satisfaction.

For Men:

  • 50 years ago, men sought “stability” in their lives as the highest value. Words like loyalty, commitment, and providing for the family contributed to the feeling of stability in men’s lives.
  • Today, men seek success. Success will provide stability.
    • This is why men tend to work too much, and why pornography and sports are the two greatest outlets of passion expression for men. Men feel like they are on a treadmill, and cannot get off of it.

For Kids:

  • In the 1950’s, the highest value of kids was to “fulfill dreams”. Kids knew how to play and converse, and were free to “do and discover”.
  • Today, the highest value for kids is simply “to survive”. With the tremendous stress teenagers are under today (sadly, created by adults and adults wanting to feel better about themselves), all they want to do is just survive.

NOTE: Remember, these posts about men, women, and kids are spoken in general terms, but I think that if we take an honest look at families around us we will find this research to be a reality in the lives of many of them.

Again, I want to hear from you: What is your experience? Does this line up with what you see in families today? Is this description accurate across all demographics?

Two good books that have also contributed to this collective data:

david-elkind.jpegrodney-clapp.jpg

1. Ties That Stress: The New Family Imbalance by David Elkind

2. Families at the Crossroads: Beyond Traditional and Modern Options by Rodney Clapp